Tag Archives: Leadership

Skills Every Leader Should Have In Their ToolBox

Recently I made a presentation what I think every successful leader needs for management practice. It’s what I called the 4p’s of successful leadership. Those 4p’s are Performance, Perception, Personality  and Passion.

I found this article because after presenting I was interested in seeing what other people’s opinion are on what qualities should  leaders possess and I thought it would worth sharing.  This article asked 332, 860 professionals-what skills have the greatest impact on a leader’s success in a position the respondent’s currently hold?

What is interesting is number one with 38% said Inspires and motivates. That aligns right with one of my P’s, personality.

See the full article to see the rankings on characteristics of a leader.

http://blogs.hbr.org/2014/07/the-skills-leaders-need-at-every-level/

 

 

“Always demand what is right, never accept second best.”

A little over three years ago I was watching the evening news. Towards the end the broadcast there was a segment to remember the life of a lifelong television producer, Mr. Jeff Gralnick, who had recently passed away. At the conclusion of Mr. Gralnick’s successful life story, the Anchor mentioned quote from him, “Always demand what is right, never accept second best.”

These words have stuck with me since and have been used as one of my own personal motto’s and guiding principles. They don’t mean that one needs to always have the “best of something,” but to strive for what is the most appropriate in a given situation.

As we continue to progress throughout our careers and develop into leaders, these are great words to operate with each day. I’ve used this philosophy when working with teams to ensure that tasks are not only completed successfully, but carried out in the correct manner, and have seen great results.

http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nightly-news/42981261

What do you think of this quote?

WJEM

Exerting Influence Without Authority

In the business environment today the “I leader, you follower” mentality may not always be the most appropriate approach anymore.

With so many business structures relying on partnerships and working with teams inside and outside the company, the traditional leader tactic will not always work. Many managers and executives need to be able to adopt a more lateral style of leadership in order to coordinate, communicate, and complete work with these interwoven relationships.

The article explains lateral leadership as the ability to combine multiple essential skills. The article explains 4 essential capabilities to assist you with understanding how to use lateral leadership to your benefit.

1) Networking – “Cultivate a broad network of relationships with the people inside and outside your company whose support you need to carry out your initiatives.”

2) Constructive persuasion and negotiation – Look at persuasion and negotiation as a way to  heighten your influence not as way to manipulate.

3) Consultation – “Take time to visit the people whose buy-in you need. Ask their opinions about the initiative you’re championing. Get their ideas as well as their reactions to your ideas.”

4) Coalition building – “It’s a fact of human nature that several people who are collectively advocating an idea exert more influence than a lone proponent.”

A few more take aways:

  •  Lateral leadership can be challenging for managers to execute. It is difficult to master many of the capabilities that go into achieving lateral leadership. It may take time.
  • It is important to find the people in your company that have a lot of influence. Take the time to meet these people and get to know them before jumping into a project with them.
  •  A natural positive environment can help bring relationships together. A company should encourage opportunities for people to meet, but let the relationships form on their own and not be forced.

Exerting Influence Without Authority

 

Discovering Your Authentic Leadership

This Harvard Business Review  article outlines how to be an authentic leader and explains that you do not have to be born with a specific set of characteristics that labels you a leader. Rather authentic leadership develops from a multiple of facets that make up ones life. Their study shows that you do not have to be in a high position at your organization or wait for that tap on the shoulder to be recognized or portray authentic leadership.

The authors and their research team surveyed over a 125 leaders at multiple levels. This proved to be one of the most extensive study on leadership development.  The team wanted to know how these leaders developed their leadership skills. They found that after “Analyzing 3,000 pages of transcripts, our team was startled to see you do not have to be born with specific characteristics or traits of a leader. Leadership emerges from your life story”.

One of their interviewees was Ann Fudge, Chairman and CEO for Young & Rubicam. She stated, “All of us have the spark of leadership in us, whether it is in business, in government, or as a nonprofit volunteer. The challenge is to understand ourselves well enough to discover where we can use our leadership gifts to serve others”.

There are 7 areas in which the authors express make up authentic leaders. Please read below for a brief description of these 7 areas.

1) Learning from Your Life Story – Many leaders use life experiences and happenings to help motivate their leadership. They use these experiences to give meaning to their lives and find the inspiration to lead.

2) Knowing Your Authentic Self -This article expresses that one of the most important capabilities of a leader to possess, is to have self awareness. As time goes on many leaders who may find benefits from the outside world such as money, fame, and power will eventually feel like something is missing. These leaders have left no time for them to understand and develop the inside part of their leadership.

3) Practicing Your Values and Principles – The article explains “leadership principles are values translated into action. Having a solid base of values and testing them under fire enables you to develop the principles you will use in leading”.

4) Balancing Your Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations – It is easy to get caught up in the external motivators such as promotions or financial rewards, but in the end of the day intrinsic motivators work closer with your values and will be more fulfilling then extrinsic motivations.

5) Building Your Support Team – Authentic leaders maintain strong relationships in multiple forms. These relationships help them continue their forward movement. These relationships can include family, mentors, colleagues, and close friends.

6) Integrating Your Life by Staying Grounded – This can be very challenging for many leaders. It is important to integrate a balance between work, family, friends, health, and even spiritual practices. This allows leaders to maintain an authenticity.

7) Empowering People to Lead – An authentic leader recognizes that leadership is not defined by their success but rather the success of an organization by empowering leaders at all levels. Authentic leaders will motivate and encourage people to lead.

I found that this HBR article offered a great perspective of what we can focus on to develop our abilities as authentic leaders. We do not have to wait to start becoming the leaders we want to be, the best time to start is now using our life stories and experiences to lead the way.

I want to end with my favorite quote from the article.

“Authentic leaders demonstrate a passion for their purpose, practice their values consistently, and lead with their hearts as well as their heads. They establish long-term, meaningful relationships and have the self-discipline to get results. They know who they are.”

Here is pdf version of the article

Discovering Your Authentic Leadership 

What makes great boards great

This article from HBR applies to almost everything we’ve been doing in MP from a group standpoint, and yet at one of the highest levels of business responsibility.

In today’s corporate society, it seems that Boards of Directors are sometimes viewed or regarded as just “guys sitting around a table”.  But this article deals specifically with the fact of how boards need to work, because there were lots of “smart people” in some of the most successful companies, while at the same time some of the most disastrous and unethical ones.

This article closely reminds me of the colored hat activity we had in class.  Who’s a black hat, causing all the trouble… It reminds me of a couple of conversations we had in our fall and spring MP groups, since in the first meetings we had, we all discussed who was strong in certain areas, who was the black hat, etc, and what other hats we purposely wanted to try on.  Instead of being complacent individuals to go with the flow and not challenge major initiatives, board members need to be engaged, involved, and asking the questions, the real ones, not just agreeing or disagreeing to a topic.

The article also noted that even though fierce discussion and disagreement is necessary and just, once the group decision has been made, the most successful boards also put up a united front on the action.  There is no “I told you so”, or private dissention if a decision was good or bad.  The board unanimously backs the forward motion of the decisions of the company.

http://archive.excellencegateway.org.uk/media/FE%20Governance/What_makes_great_boards_great.pdf

Making a change

If I’m being honest – I PROSCRASTINATE!  Thus why I’m just now posting my first blog deliverable.  I’ve somewhat “successfully”  functioned this way for as long as I can remember, but I know that I can do better and I’m trying to rectify my situation.   I realize that my condition adds stress to all the people’s lives who count on me daily to accomplish their tasks and I want to change, but I haven’t – until maybe recently.

A combination of a few recent events in my life have hopefully helped me turn the corner for the better.  First, I need to apologize for my last thirty plus years of waiting till the last moment to start studying for tests (sorry Mom and professors), turning in work projects at the last moment just in time to meet deadlines (sorry boss), and even hitting the snooze button a few too many times each morning (sorry wife!).

A few months ago my wife and I found out that we are expecting our first child, a son, and it thrills us both!  Since then I have often thought about what kind of person he will become and what will he learn from me as he grows up.  I want him to be a polite, motivated, and caring individual who works hard, has great friends, and is able to experience all of the wonderful things our world has to offer.  I also don’t want him to pick up on any of my bad habits and so I am realizing I need to make a change, quickly because he is due in September.

During this time of reflection my sister forwarded me an email with a speech given as the commencement address to the University of Texas graduates by Naval Admiral William McRaven.  You may have already seen or read this speech, but in his address Adm. McRaven speaks about how changing the world is possible and ten lessons that he learned during his distinguished career in the military.  http://www.utexas.edu/news/2014/05/16/admiral-mcraven-commencement-speech/  His first lesson about accomplishing the simple task of making your bed each morning took me back to my days spent in the military.  I realized that waking up with a sense of purpose reminds me every morning to stay focused on my tasks and not to waste time on Facebook, playing solitare, or checking ESPN for random sports stories.  This initial task, at least for the last two weeks, has started my day off right and allowed me to positively tackle the oncoming challenges each day.

We also were assigned the reading “The Brand Called You” in BUS634P. The Brand Called You  This reading reminded me of the importance of how every action that I take impacts the impression that I leave with customers, colleagues, classmates, family, and espically my soon to be child.

I am working to change my current brand and stop proscrastinating for my son most importantly, but I also believe that if I am successful in doing so the benefits will improve my relationships both personally and professionally.  From a work perspective, I anticipate advancing in my career and leading a team of sales people.  My desired brand of punctuality, on time results, and dependability needs to be in place before I can effectively expect to manage others.  While I fail some days, I am striving to change my habits and am making progress.

I don’t know if you have experienced the same doubts or concerns, but if so how did you change your patterns, lessen your daily distractions, and become someone who accomplishes everything on their daily checklist?  Thanks for any help you can provide – from me and my soon to be son!

 

Are you a Leader or a Manager?

I took a class in undergrad about “Servant Leadership” by Robert Greenleaf. I started questioning the difference between a manager and a leader, and have been intrigued by the concept ever since. As I was interviewing for my current position, I was questioned as to what type of leader I would be in the organization.

I pondered, and proceeded to explain the type of manager I would be and the skills that I would bring to the table. I described that I did not feel that someone could place me in the role of “leader”. It was a position that others saw me as based on how they felt about my abilities. They would make the decision to follow, I could not decide that for them.

I stumbled upon this article in the Wall Street Journal regarding this very topic. It discusses the importance of differentiating between a manager and a leader as the concept of the knowledge worker becomes more profound in our society.

“The leader originates, the leader challenges, the leader is an individual, the leader focuses on people.”

Take a look at the article and see how your natural characteristics fall into the spectrum. I believe that leadership is a way of life. It’s a characteristic that exudes from you, both in the professional world and your personal life. Leaders are the people that I select as mentors. The fact that I have placed them in that position in my life re-iterates how I feel about their ability to lead and challenge me.

My father is a mouthy, Italian businessman with salt and pepper hair. He has drowned me in the business world from a very young age. Along the way, I have gathered a few Tony-isms from him about this matter:

“You can promote people and make them managers, but you cannot make them leaders. That trait is who you are. When it comes out, people will know.”

“The person who knows how and why will always have a leg up on the person who only knows how or why.”

He’s a deep fellow.

Decide the type of position you want to hold in the lives of your co-workers, and work towards being looked at in that light. These abilities will alter the way you present, the way you communicate, and the way you analyze situations.

I leave you with one final Tony-ism: “Be cautious not to take too much advice.”

Christine

Execs and the Art of Teaching

There is no article attached to this post, only my personal experiences with one specific COO over the past 3 years at my company.

In my short career, I have had the opportunity to meet one C-level executive that was unlike any other high level director I’ve ever met.

Most of the D-V-C level executives I’ve met were always worried about the big picture, and were always worried about how to make the entire “thing” come together based off previous experience they had.  Most of these executives were always desk or travel executives – the ones you rarely saw, the ones that when you did see them, they had a crew of folks surrounding them when walking the floor.  Sure, these guys came and talked to you, wanted to give you a little bit of their busy day, to show that they truly did care about you as an employee.  And I respect that, because I know it’s a person of one vs. an employee base of many, and going out of your way to come say hello to YOU (/to me), does mean something.

But I now realize that there was something missing from these executive interactions.  I’ve had the opportunity to learn from one of the smartest manufacturing businessmen I know.  At my company we have a COO who is extremely involved in floor activities.  He has very specific lean manufacturing philosophies that he has implemented across our entire company (and his previous companies).  The most important thing though is how he has implemented them – by directly teaching us: the engineers, the staff, the operators, the managers.  He has been hands-on on the floor, and has had specific training courses that he developed and taught in.  These aren’t basic powerpoint presentations where a guy comes in a suit to give you a pre-recited speech with the “any questions?” slide at the end.  This is an executive who cares to TEACH and SHOW you the philosophies he wants you to practice.  Then, he walks with you out to the floor to help you when you need help, and to judge you when he’s got expectations for your work.  He’s not a soft person who’s there to cradle you when you don’t succeed – no, he’s there to kick you’re a** because his title starts with a C and he’s got high expectations for your work.  Here’s the theory, here’s the process, learn it, practice it, execute it.  But throughout the whole process, he started with one fundamental rule – teach.

I’ve learned some fundamental thoughts from him in the past three years:

1) If you want to be a respected manager (all the way through to exec), you need to teach.  Not from a desk.  Not from a powerpoint.  Not by just “setting what-you-think-are examples” on the floor.

2) As you climb the ladder with knowledge, open your knowledge to others.  Managers aren’t just there to make big decisions and set guidelines – the good ones are there to teach the next generation.

3) As your managers and staff are learning your principles, make sure that you are not only teaching them the ideas of the topic, but also how to communicate them later, making them effective teachers.

4) Surround yourself with other effective D and V level managers/execs who also know how to teach – not just how to make tough decisions.  They will help to reinforce a culture of knowledge development.

5) Make sure you followup with those you teach, even if at first it’s perceived as a “boot camp”.  You’d be surprised at their reaction when you test them later when you turn the tables and it’s their turn to teach.  So far, the first reactions I’ve personally received, even from operators on the floor, has been one of shyness, and anger.  Yet by the second or third time, it’s one of pride.  People are proud of what they’ve learned, and are proud to show someone else the how-to.

Keeping Your Team Engaged

If there is anything that I have learned during my career thus far it is that change is constant. Over the past ten months, my team has undergone two monumental restructures. Although I believe that both of these changes have been for the best, the change itself was not easy.

While recently reviewing “Leadership Sustainability” by Dave Ulrich, I came across several key takeaways that are simple yet very powerful. Even though I didn’t have this content as I went in to the recent restructures, I realized that the process that my team was following was very similar to several of the key principles identified in the book. However, there is one that we haven’t quite mastered as well as the others.

The book identifies five rules of the Leadership Code:

  1. Shape the future
  2. Make things happen
  3. Engage today’s talent
  4. Build the next generation
  5. Invest in yourself

They sound simple enough, right? I thought so, too.

Throughout the organizational changes that we’ve recently undergone, I’ve found that keeping my team engaged is proving to be harder than I initially anticipated. Through a series of meetings, surveys and conversations, I have identified a few areas that I believe are at the root of the issue.

The first area that I’ve identified is a strong sense of community. Even though the majority of my team does have a strong sense of community, for some, that community factor is missing. For these few individuals, they remain distant and do not take initiative to interact with other members of the team besides the required interactions for various projects that they are working on.

The second area that stands out is recognition. Each individual craves different forms of recognition and several members of my team were looking for additional recognition. I’ve found that complements and encouragement is one of the easiest ways to boost a team member’s confidence. However, for some, they feel most rewarded when they are recognized for their work in front of others. Therefore, I’ve been intentional lately to try to recognize people using a combination of the two. I’ve noticed that team members really appreciate this and will take action to try to remain in the spotlight when they know that they will be recognizing for their efforts.

The third area that my team struggles with from time to time is cultural differences. Our company has a very strong corporate culture that is conservative in nature. However, many members of our team have beliefs that differ from the cultural norms. I highly value these differences in thought and encourage members to always be themselves. However, that is much easier said than done and team members can easily become disengaged when the culture doesn’t align well with their own views.

I’m curious to know if other organizations struggle with keeping their teams engaged in the company and the work that they’re doing. If so, is it for similar reasons that I’ve described and what ways have you discovered that work well for keeping them better engaged?

Contrasting Styles of Management

As an avid reader, an addicted audio book listener and a small business owner I have read countless business biographies. Richard Branson, John D. Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Warren Buffett, Steve Jobs and John Mackey highlight the list. I have also read several political biographies. These include Harry Truman, Abraham Lincoln, Winston Churchill and the last three American Presidents. The effectiveness of these leaders can be debated, but they were all leaders. I have tried to find parallels between these historical figures to enhance my own abilities, but there are not many consistencies. Some of these men were tactical and some bold. Some were taciturn and others charismatic. Some were geniuses and others not at all.  Some were ostentatious and others frugal. As it seems more appropriate, here are some of my insights about the business leaders.

Richard Branson never graduated from high school, but instead started Student Magazine to protest the Vietnam War quickly followed by a mail order record business which led to Virgin Records. Branson never followed the rules. While running Virgin Records he convinced his board to let Virgin venture into the Airline business – and it worked. This would contradict the wisdom of almost any business executive or business school academic, but he trusted his instincts.

John D. Rockefeller also dropped out of high school. His success in the oil business came from achieving monopoly status by beating his competitors on price through economies of scale. His vast wealth stemmed from retaining and expanding his shares in Standard Oil. He bought up competing refineries left and right offering either cash or stock to the owners. He consistently advised them to take the stock and never let it go. Although he was neither charismatic nor a genius (by academic standards), he stuck to his plan and fervently believed in the company he created.

Ted Turner might have been the one business executive of whom I am aware to possess genius level intelligence and elite charisma. He made it through high school, but dropped out of college at Brown. After his father passed, Turner was only in his early 20’s. He negotiated, pleaded and even threated the acquirer of his father’s billboard business and eventually got it back. Fearlessly, he expanded, got into radio then cable TV, bought the Braves and started the first 24 hour new station, CNN. When he bought the Braves they were losing about $1 Million per year. He paid $10 Million and almost immediately guaranteed that they would win the World Series in five years. I am doubtful that he had a plan to bounce from outdoor advertising to radio to cable television and along the way own two professional sports teams. But, there is no doubt that he recognized opportunity and was a visionary of sorts in several business.

Warren Buffett took a more conventional path. He graduated from high school with good grades and an entrepreneurial spirit. He went To UPenn, but transferred to Nebraska likely due to home sickness. He graduated from Nebraska and even went to graduate school at Columbia to learn under his idol, Ben Graham, the “father of value investing”. He was a stock broker, but quickly realized that he preferred to create partnerships for his investors. With huge returns early on he quickly became a rich man. Part of his knack for big returns lied in his bold strategies. If he believed in something he would invest heavily. Early on he bought a huge stake in Geico which gave him “float” and the ability to buy up more stocks. Singlehandedly, over 50 years, he served as the one clear example of the ability to beat the market. When the Efficient Market Hypothesis popularized among academics, he was the one inexplicable phenomenon. It is hard to say his secret, but investing heavily and spending very little along the way is a good formula.

Steve Jobs was perhaps the least conventional. He dropped out of college and created the first Apple Computers out of a garage with his friend Steve Wozniak. Jobs did not even know how to write code for computers, but guided “Woz” as the first Apple computer was created. This is hard for some computer experts to fathom, but Jobs who helped found the company and then turn it into the Apple that we know today, could not even create a computer. Gates jabbed at Jobs for this lacking this skillset so important the computer brethren of the 1980’s. Despite lacking the technical expertise, Jobs always ran the show often verbally attacking the designers until he liked what he saw. According to some testimonies, he was wildly inconsistent – one day claiming that something was terrible and the next not only proclaiming it great but taking credit for it. He was incredibly unpredictable and admittedly “mercurial”, but his focus was always the product. When asked why he chose not to use market research he replied that Alexander Graham Bell did not use market research when he invented to telephone. He was a visionary. He singlehandedly turned Apple into one of the most profitable companies in the world and made Pixar into a powerhouse, launched two of the greatest advertisement campaigns in history, and revolutionized the phone, tablet and music industries. He just seemed to know what people would want. A good example of his uniqueness is that he opted not to bathe for long periods as he swore that his vegetarian diet made showering superfluous. Jobs broke every mold for a CEO. He didn’t go to a fancy school, did not even truly understand the intricacies of his products, was extremely difficult to work for, and refused to adhere to societal norms. It is far easier to be confident when you possess all of the abilities consistent with the expectations for someone in your position, but far more difficult to lack all of those qualities. Simply put, Jobs’ confidence is unsurpassed in my opinion.

John Mackey built Whole Foods from the ground up. His style is more modern and outlook lends credence to both his company and capitalism in general. Mackey believes that companies successful in the modern age need to exemplify a “conscious” culture. He does not believe in gouging suppliers, beating up competitors or only meeting the minimum standards for ethics as required by law. He proclaims that modern companies must have a clear culture that emphasizes what he calls “Winning to the Sixth Power”. This means running a business so that you bolster company profits as well as suppliers, employees, the environment, the industry etc. Quite the contrarian, he believes in empowering employees through autonomy and rarely ever firing them, allowing good suppliers fair profit margins, listening to his critics and trying to rationalize their viewpoints, exceeding environmental and animal welfare standards. He even goes out of his way to compliment his competitors (i.e. Trader Joe’s) when he believes they are meeting these standards.

Judging from these business leaders, there are a lot of different ways to effectively manage a company. Branson was bold and charismatic. Rockefeller was obsessive and borderline tyrannical. Turner was brilliant and energetic, Buffett was purposeful and consistent, Jobs was obsessed with the product itself and Mackey emphatic about the culture. The only parallels I can ascertain are hard work and confidence. I know it would be far more helpful if it certain characteristics led to success in business, but like many things, it’s not that simple.

 

 

References

Chernow, R. (2007). Titan: the life of John D. Rockefeller, Sr. New York: Knopf Double Day Publishing Group.

Turner, T. (2009). Call Me Ted. New York: Hachette Audio.

Schroeder, A. (2008). The Snowball. Warren Buffett and the Business of Life. New York: Random House.

Issacson, W. (2011). Steve Jobs. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Sisodia, R., George, B., Mackey, J. (2014). Conscious Capitalism: liberating the heroic spirit of business. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.