As part of this semester’s MP course I wanted to solicit feedback on my performance from constituents beyond my direct supervisor. I looked through the web for different options, and I found that I favor MIT’s performance evaluation templates the most. They have two formats that I think can be used to capture a lot of information about feedback on our professional performances.
One of them is focused on a quantitative evaluation of your performance along several parameters; the other is more narrative style and asks for stories regarding your development in your role and your organization.
As a quick summary, here are the parameters around which the quant one measures performance:
1. Proficiency/skill in carrying out assignments (ability/competency)
2. Planning/organizing/prioritizing work load (analysis/time management)
3. Holds self accountable for assigned responsibilities (accountability/reliability)
4. Proficiency at improving work methods/procedures (continual improvement)
5. Effective communicator
6. Ability to work independently/ or with a team
7. Willingness to take on additional responsibilities
8. Adeptness in analyzing facts, problem solving, decision-making, and demonstrating good judgement (sensible thinker)
All managers are different, and some people may have managers that have unclear expectations, or do not communicate their expectations. This points to the importance of being able to manage oneself. I think that pointers such as these can lead the individual to continually reflect and evaluate their own performance. Of course, we may not be as objective as an outside source (but heck, they are likely not to be objective either!), but at least we can bring a greater awareness to monitoring our performance. By bringing a higher level of awareness, we should be able to hone in on issues, and do a little trouble-shooting ourselves.


